4.7 Article

Deep learning from physicochemical information of concrete with an artificial language for property prediction and reaction discovery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106870

关键词

Deep learning; Physicochemical information; Concrete properties; Artificial language; Reaction discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an approach to discover the intrinsic relationships between the physicochemical properties of concrete ingredients and its mechanical properties. The proposed approach has been implemented to predict the compressive strength of complex concrete mixtures, assess the importance of variables, and discover chemical reactions, showing high accuracy and high generalizability. This research advances the understanding of complex concrete mixtures and the design of low-carbon cost-effective concrete.
Existing machine learning-based approaches to investigate and design concrete mainly use the mixture design variables to predict concrete properties and do not consider the physicochemical properties of ingredients such as the particle size distribution and chemical composition of various binders and aggregates. This paper presents an approach to discover the intrinsic relationships between the physicochemical properties of the ingredients and mechanical properties of concrete. Specifically, this research creates an artificial language to represent concrete mixtures and the physicochemical information of their ingredients, develops a feature extraction method based on character-level N-grams, and proposes a method to configure deep learning models automatically. The pro-posed approach has been implemented to predict the compressive strength of complex concrete mixtures, assess the importance of variables, and discover chemical reactions, showing high accuracy and high generalizability. This research advances the capabilities of understanding the underlying reactions for complex concrete mixtures and designing low-carbon cost-effective concrete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据