4.6 Article

MAPK family genes' influences on myogenesis in cattle: Genome-wide analysis and identification

期刊

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 198-212

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.04.024

关键词

MAPK; Genome-wide analysis; Cattle; Myogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 13 MAPK genes were identified in cattle and their protein properties were characterized. These genes were divided into three subfamilies and showed tissue-specific expression. BtMAPK6 and BtMAPK12 were highly expressed in muscle tissues and had different effects on muscle cell differentiation. These findings provide new insights into the specific mechanisms of MAPK genes in myogenesis.
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family is highly conserved in mammals, and is involved in a va-riety of physiological phenomena like regeneration, development, cell proliferation, and differentiation. In this study, 13 MAPK genes were identified in cattle and their corresponding protein properties were characterized using genome-wide identification and analysis. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 13 BtMAPKs were cluster grouped into eight major evolutionary branches, which were segmented into three large subfamilies: ERK, p38 and JNK MAPK. BtMAPKs from the same subfamily had similar protein motif compositions, but considerably different exon-intron patterns. The heatmap analysis of transcriptome sequencing data showed that the expression of BtMAPKs was tissue-specific, with BtMAPK6 and BtMAPK12 highly expressed in muscle tissues. Furthermore, knockdown of BtMAPK6 and BtMAPK12 revealed that BtMAPK6 had no effect on myogenic cell proliferation, but negatively affected the differentiation of myogenic cells. In contrast, BtMAPK12 improved both the cell proliferation and differentiation. Taken together, these results provide novel insights into the functions of MAPK families in cattle, which could serve as a basis for further studies on the specific mechanisms of the genes in myogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据