4.5 Review

The Effectiveness and Safety of Exenatide Versus Metformin in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 2349-2361

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01222-y

关键词

Exenatide; Metformin; Obesity; Reproductive function; Polycystic ovary syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder that affects women of childbearing age, causing reproductive dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia, and obesity. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, with metformin, an insulin sensitizer, in treating PCOS patients. The results showed that exenatide was more effective in increasing pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, decreasing body mass index, and improving insulin resistance compared to metformin. However, more high-quality studies are needed to provide stronger evidence for the use of exenatide in this patient population.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder that affects women of childbearing age, resulting in reproductive dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia, and obesity. While several drugs are currently approved for use in these patients, their relative effectiveness remains controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the reproductive efficacy and safety of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, versus metformin, an insulin sensitizer, in the treatment of patients with PCOS. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, comprising 785 PCOS patients, of whom 385 received exenatide and 400 received metformin. Compared with metformin, exenatide was significantly more effective in treating these patients, as demonstrated by increased pregnancy rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 2.92, P = 0.002), greater ovulation rate (RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.80, P = 0.004), decreased body mass index (mean difference = - 1.72 kg/m(2), 95% CI - 2.27 to - 1.18, P = 0.00001), and improved insulin resistance (standard mean difference = - 0.62, 95% CI - 0.91 to - 0.33, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events (gastrointestinal reactions, hypoglycemia, etc.) between the two therapies. However, given the moderate to high quality and possible bias of the included studies, the available evidence is inconclusive. More high-quality studies are needed to assess the effects of exenatide in order to provide stronger evidence for its use in this patient population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据