4.7 Article

Is green finance really ?green?? Examining the long-run relationship between green finance, renewable energy and environmental performance in developing countries

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 341-355

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.020

关键词

Green finance; Carbon emission; Renewable energy; VECM; Cointegration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the impact of green finance on environmental performance in developing countries. Using panel cointegration analysis and panel VECM, the study confirms the cointegration between carbon emissions (CO2) and green finance, real GDP, urbanization, and renewable energy in developing economies. The results show that both green finance and renewable energy have significant inhibitory effects on CO2 emissions, highlighting the importance of promoting these factors. The study also finds the existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve and the increasing effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions. Several policy implications and recommendations are drawn from the study.
This paper examines the impact of green finance on environmental performance in developing countries. Using panel cointegration analysis and panel vector error correction model (VECM) to a sample of 76 developing economies from 2010 to 2019, this study confirms that carbon emissions (CO2) is cointegrated with green finance, real gross domestic product, urbanization, and renewable energy under different specifications and therefore we estimate the long-run relationships among these variables. Specifically, both green finance and renewable energy are found to exert significant and inhibitory effects on CO2 emissions, reaffirming the necessity to promote green finance and renewable energy. Results from the paper also document the existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve and the increasing effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions. Several policy im-plications and recommendations are drawn from this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据