4.6 Article

Gamma ray shielding and structural properties for TeO2-BaO-MO modified with Bi2O3, TiO2, MnO2, MoO3

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110714

关键词

Tellurite glass; Modifiers; Radiation shielding; FTIR; XRD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, four glass samples of TeO2-BaO-MO (where MO = Bi2O3, TiO2, MnO2, MoO3) were fabricated using the melt quench method. The structural properties were investigated using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). The radiation shielding properties were determined using Phy-X software. The BTBi sample showed the highest density and best shielding properties, making it an excellent option for radiation shielding applications.
In this study, we fabricated four glass samples of TeO2-BaO-MO (where MO = Bi2O3, TiO2, MnO2, MoO3) using the melt quench method. The structural properties were explored using different techniques such as x-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). Moreover, the radiation shielding properties were determined using Phy-X software. The XRD results affirm the amorphous nature of current glasses. At the same time, the FTIR showed a broad peak associated with overlapping between asymmetrical stretching vibrations of the TeO3 trigonal structural and stretching vibrations of Te-O vibration in TeO4 units. The highest density was achieved by a sample containing bismuth (BTBi), followed by manganese (BTMn), molybdenum (BTMo), and titanium (BTTi), and the density values were ranged from 5.087 to 6.059 g/cm3. These results were reflected in the shielding properties in the same order. The mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) for BTBi, BTMo, BTMn, and BTTi at 0.2 MeV are 35.271, 23.520, 20.166, and 19.942 cm2/g for BTBi, BTMo, BTMn, and BTTi, respectively, indicating the superiority of the BTBi sample on the other samples in radiation shielding field. So, it is an excellent option for use in the radiation shielding field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据