4.7 Review

Defining recovery in schizophrenia: A review of outcome studies

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115134

关键词

Schizophrenia; Personal recovery; Functionality; Remission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder with diverse ways of measuring recovery. Recovery can be assessed from a clinical perspective or from a patient-focused viewpoint. This meta-analysis examined the relationship between subjective recovery and clinical components of recovery in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The results showed weak and inverse associations between indicators of personal recovery and remission, but a moderate relationship between functionality and personal recovery.
Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder with a heterogenous course and different ways in which recovery is measured or perceived. Recovery in schizophrenia is a complex process that it can be defined either from a clinical perspective focused on sustained symptom and functional remission, or from a patient-focused one, as a self-broadening process aimed at living a meaningful life beyond mental illness. Until now, studies analysed these domains separately, without examining their mutual relations and changes over time. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to examine the relationship of global measures of subjective recovery with each of the compo-nents of clinical recovery such as symptom severity and functioning, in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The results showed that the association between different indicators of personal recovery and remission are weak and inverse (dIG+ = -0.18, z = -2.71, p < 0.01), however, this finding is not substantial according to the sensitivity indicators. With respect to functionality and personal recovery, there was a moderate relationship (dIG+ = 0.26, z = 7.894, p < 0.01) with adequate sensitivity indices. In addition, a low consensus exists between subjective measures that are more related to the patient's perspective and clinical measures based on experts and clinician's viewpoint.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据