4.5 Article

Enabling cryo-EM density interpretation from yeast native cell extracts by proteomics data and AlphaFold structures

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 23, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202200096

关键词

AI-guided; computational analysis; cryo-EM; homogenates; protein structure prediction; structural proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, protein communities and inter-protein interactions were identified in a yeast native cell extract using proteomics analysis and cryogenic electron microscopy. By combining AI-guided protein structure prediction, a density was successfully assigned to the yeast fatty acid synthase complex.
In the cellular context, proteins participate in communities to perform their function. The detection and identification of these communities as well as in-community interactions has long been the subject of investigation, mainly through proteomics analysis with mass spectrometry. With the advent of cryogenic electron microscopy and the resolution revolution, their visualization has recently been made possible, even in complex, native samples. The advances in both fields have resulted in the generation of large amounts of data, whose analysis requires advanced computation, often employing machine learning approaches to reach the desired outcome. In this work, we first performed a robust proteomics analysis of mass spectrometry (MS) data derived from a yeast native cell extract and used this information to identify protein communities and inter-protein interactions. Cryo-EM analysis of the cell extract provided a reconstruction of a biomolecule at medium resolution (similar to 8 angstrom (FSC = 0.143)). Utilizing MS-derived proteomics data and systematic fitting of AlphaFold-predicted atomic models, this density was assigned to the 2.6 MDa complex of yeast fatty acid synthase. Our proposed workflow identifies protein complexes in native cell extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by combining proteomics, cryo-EM, and AI-guided protein structure prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据