4.7 Article

Structural optimization and separation characteristic of a separating device for three phases: Oil, water and solid

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 200-213

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.018

关键词

Oil-water-solid phase separation; Lubricating oil; Separation efficiency; Structural optimization; Response surface methodology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A device for simultaneous separation of oil, water, and solids is proposed, and its separation characteristics are investigated using a numerical model. The optimized structural parameters improve the separation performance, resulting in higher oil removal and solid removal rates. This study provides valuable guidance for the design of high-performance devices for lubricating oil purification using physical methods.
Solid particles and water are widely used as lubricating oils. However, oil-water-solid separation is inefficient when conventional methods are used. Therefore, a device is proposed to simultaneously separate oil, water, and solids from one another. In this study, a numerical model was established by combining the mixture, Reynolds stress, population balance, and discrete-phase models to investigate the separation characteristics of a separating device. The effect of the structural parameters on the separation was investigated, and the important structural parameters were optimized using the response surface method. The results indicate that the optimal underflow pipe, certain pipe, and sideflow pipe diameters are 6.5, 13.49, and 7 mm, respectively; at this instant, the tangential velocity in the small cone section and certain structure is large, the oil volume fraction is low near the underflow pipe, and the number of solid particles separating from the sideflow outlet increases, and the deoiling rate and desolidification rate reach a maximum of 84.45% and 91.44%. This study can provide valuable guidance for the design of high-performance devices for lubricating oil purification using physical methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据