4.6 Article

Performance of bleaching clays in dechlorophyllisation of microalgal oil: A comparative study

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 94-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2023.03.002

关键词

Bentonite; Adsorption; Decolourization; Spent bleaching clay; Regeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates and compares the ability of three different clay types to remove chlorophyll from microalgae oil, finding that acid-treated bentonite clay is the most effective. High temperature and ultrasound treatment conditions also demonstrate satisfactory chlorophyll removal efficiency. Additionally, it is found that chlorophyll can be adsorbed on the clays without significantly affecting the lipid composition in the microalgae extract.
While clay has been extensively studied for its ability to remove chlorophyll from vegetable oil, its effects and suitability on microalgae oil have received far less attention. In this study, three different clay types are evaluated and compared for their ability to dechlorophyllise microalgae oil. The clays involved are kaolinite, Fuller's earth and bentonite clay which are activated by acid treatment. Bentonite clay is found to remove chlorophyll effectively (76.04%) than kaolinite and Fuller's earth due to the presence of porous materials that facilitate adsorption. Additionally, the conditions of high temperature (79.69%) and ultrasound treatment (84.24%) demonstrate satisfactory chlorophyll removal efficiency. Another promising finding is that chlorophyll can be adsorbed on the clays without affecting the lipid composition in the microalgae extract significantly. Spent bleaching clay disposal is a growing issue that poses an environmental burden. Reusing bleaching clay can lower expenses and increase oil recovery. In a single sequential run, using spent bentonite clay yields the outcomes comparable to those of virgin bentonite clay. This finding offers a useful green and environmentally friendly approach to remove chlorophyll from microalgae oil feedstock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据