4.7 Article

Rethinking same-sex sexual behaviour: male field crickets have broad mating filters

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0002

关键词

same-sex sexual behaviour; mating filters; misdirected behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Same-sex sexual behavior is not an anomaly and should not be treated as such. It is similar to other misdirected behaviors in animals and can be better understood by considering an individual's mating filter. Male Pacific field crickets engage in same-sex behavior and also misdirect courtship towards juveniles, suggesting that same-sex behavior should be considered alongside other misdirected behaviors. By reframing misdirected behaviors as a product of mating filters, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of reproductive behavior and its advantages.
Same-sex sexual behaviour (SSB) occurs in many animals and is often treated as an anomaly requiring special explanation. One common explanation for SSB is mistaken identity. However, animals make similar 'mistakes' in other contexts-such as attempting to mate with immature individuals or inanimate objects. Framing such behaviours as 'mistakes' risks misinterpreting how animals make flexible mating decisions. Here we make a case for an alternative approach to thinking about SSB by instead considering an individual's mating filter. A broad filter means directing courtship toward anything that resembles a potential mate, whilst a narrow filter means only courting with receptive targets. We illustrate this approach by examining the mating filters of male Pacific field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus). We find that males engage in SSB but also misdirect courtship toward juveniles (but not plastic crickets). This finding suggests that SSB is not an anomaly and is better considered alongside other misdirected behaviours. We argue that by viewing misdirected behaviours through the lens of mating filters rather than as 'mistakes' we can build a more nuanced understanding of reproductive behaviour and begin to determine when having a broader mating filter can be advantageous.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据