4.7 Article

Morphology and niche evolution influence hummingbird speciation rates

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1793

关键词

dynamic traits; diversification; evolutionary divergence; niche conservatism; Trochilidae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the impact of traits on speciation in hummingbirds, a clade with diverse speciation rates, morphology, and niches. Two hypotheses were tested, suggesting that speciation rates are influenced by either trait conservatism or trait divergence. The findings showed that smaller hummingbirds with shorter bills, living at higher elevations and experiencing greater temperature ranges, exhibit faster speciation. Additionally, speciation was found to increase with rates of divergence in niche traits, but not in morphological traits.
How traits affect speciation is a long-standing question in evolution. We investigate whether speciation rates are affected by the traits themselves or by the rates of their evolution, in hummingbirds, a clade with great variation in speciation rates, morphology and ecological niches. Further, we test two opposing hypotheses, postulating that speciation rates are promoted by trait conservatism or, alternatively, by trait divergence. To address these questions, we analyse morphological (body mass and bill length) and niche traits (temperature and precipitation position and breadth, and mid-elevation), using a variety of methods to estimate speciation rates and correlate them with traits and their evolutionary rates. When it comes to the traits, we find faster speciation in smaller hummingbirds with shorter bills, living at higher elevations and experiencing greater temperature ranges. As for the trait evolutionary rates, we find that speciation increases with rates of divergence in the niche traits, but not in the morphological traits. Together, these results reveal the interplay of mechanisms through which different traits and their evolutionary rates (conservatism or divergence) influence the origination of hummingbird diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据