4.7 Article

A Devonian crinoid with a diamond microlattice

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0092

关键词

echinoderms; biomineralization; stereom; calcite; TPMS; predation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to their exceptional physical properties, cellular structures have various applications in different disciplines. Although triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) are rarely found in living organisms, a similar microstructure has been discovered in a 385 million-year-old crinoid. This discovery reveals the evolutionary optimization process of echinoderms in forming a lightweight, stiff, and damage-tolerant skeleton, which can inspire the development of biomimetic materials.
Owing to their remarkable physical properties, cellular structures, such as triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS), have multidisciplinary and multifunctional applications. Although these structures are observed in nature, examples of TPMS with large length scales in living organisms are exceedingly rare. Recently, microstructure reminiscent of the diamond-type TPMS was documented in the skeleton of the modern knobby starfish Protoreaster nodosus. Here we report a similar microlattice in a 385 Myr old crinoid Haplocrinites, which pushes back the origins of this highly ordered microstructure in echinoderms into the Devonian. Despite the low Mg2+/Ca2+ ratio of the 'calcite' Devonian sea, the skeleton of these crinoids has high-Mg content, which indicates strong biological control over biomineralogy. We suggest that such an optimization of trabecular arrangement additionally enriched in magnesium, which enhances the mechanical properties, might have evolved in these crinoids in response to increased predation pressure during the Middle Palaeozoic Marine Revolution. This discovery illustrates the remarkable ability of echinoderms, through the process of evolutionary optimization, to form a lightweight, stiff and damage-tolerant skeleton, which serves as an inspiration for biomimetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据