4.8 Article

Pleiotropic role of TRAF7 in skull-base meningiomas and congenital heart disease

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2214997120

关键词

TRAF7; meningioma; cilia; congenital heart defect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, somatic variants of the TRAF7 gene were found to be responsible for anterior skull-base meningiomas, while inherited mutations of TRAF7 were identified to cause congenital heart defects. The dominant effect of TRAF7 mutants was demonstrated, as they inhibited protein function by heterodimerizing with wild-type protein. The common genetic origin of the two different pathologies was traced back to the TRAF7-expressing neural crest, which gives rise to forebrain meninges and the cardiac outflow tract. Somatic and inherited mutations disrupted TRAF7-IFT57 interactions, leading to cilia degradation. The lack of cilia in TRAF7-mutant meningioma primary cultures and the development of cardiac, craniofacial, and ciliary defects in Xenopus and zebrafish upon TRAF7 knockdown suggest a mechanistic convergence between TRAF7-driven meningiomas and developmental heart defects.
While somatic variants of TRAF7 (Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 7) underlie anterior skull-base meningiomas, here we report the inherited mutations of TRAF7 that cause congenital heart defects. We show that TRAF7 mutants operate in a dominant manner, inhibiting protein function via heterodimerization with wild-type protein. Further, the shared genetics of the two disparate pathologies can be traced to the common origin of forebrain meninges and cardiac outflow tract from the TRAF7-expressing neural crest. Somatic and inherited mutations disrupt TRAF7-IFT57 interactions leading to cilia degradation. TRAF7-mutant meningioma primary cultures lack cilia, and TRAF7 knockdown causes cardiac, craniofacial, and ciliary defects in Xenopus and zebrafish, suggesting a mechanistic convergence for TRAF7-driven meningiomas and developmental heart defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据