4.8 Article

Imaging the subcellular viscoelastic properties of mouse oocytes

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2213836120

关键词

oocyte viscoelasticity; oocyte biomechanics; elastic waves; microelastography; optical image reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, researchers have explored cellular biomechanical properties as a new method of oocyte selection in reproductive science. The reconstruction of viscoelastic parameter images in such materials remains a challenge. This study proposes a framework for mapping viscoelasticity at the subcellular scale and successfully applies it to live mouse oocytes.
In recent years, cellular biomechanical properties have been investigated as an alternative to morphological assessments for oocyte selection in reproductive science. Despite the high relevance of cell viscoelasticity characterization, the reconstruction of spatially distributed viscoelastic parameter images in such materials remains a major challenge. Here, a framework for mapping viscoelasticity at the subcellular scale is proposed and applied to live mouse oocytes. The strategy relies on the principles of optical microelastography for imaging in combination with the overlapping subzone nonlinear inversion technique for complex-valued shear modulus reconstruction. The three-dimensional nature of the viscoelasticity equations was accommodated by applying an oocyte geometry-based 3D mechanical motion model to the measured wave field. Five domains-nucleolus, nucleus, cytoplasm, perivitelline space, and zona pellucida-could be visually differentiated in both oocyte storage and loss modulus maps, and statistically significant differences were observed between most of these domains in either property reconstruction. The method proposed herein presents excellent potential for biomechanical-based monitoring of oocyte health and complex transformations across lifespan. It also shows appreciable latitude for generalization to cells of arbitrary shape using conventional microscopy equipment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据