4.6 Article

Infectivity and Transmissibility of Avian H9N2 Influenza Viruses in Pigs

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 90, 期 7, 页码 3506-3514

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02605-15

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Guangxi Science and Technology Development Plan [GKH 1347004-27]
  2. Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Diseases (Hong Kong SAR Government) [12111252]
  3. Guangdong Top-Tier University Development Scheme
  4. Li Ka Shing Foundation
  5. Distinguished Expert Scheme of Guangxi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The H9N2 influenza viruses that are enzootic in terrestrial poultry in China pose a persistent pandemic threat to humans. To investigate whether the continuous circulation and adaptation of these viruses in terrestrial poultry increased their infectivity to pigs, we conducted a serological survey in pig herds with H9N2 viruses selected from the aquatic avian gene pool (Y439 lineage) and the enzootic terrestrial poultry viruses (G1 and Y280 lineages). We also compared the infectivity and transmissibility of these viruses in pigs. It was found that more than 15% of the pigs sampled from 2010 to 2012 in southern China were seropositive to either G1 or Y280 lineage viruses, but none of the sera were positive to the H9 viruses from the Y439 lineage. Viruses of the G1 and Y280 lineages were able to infect experimental pigs, with detectable nasal shedding of the viruses and seroconversion, whereas viruses of the Y439 lineage did not cause a productive infection in pigs. Thus, adaptation and prevalence in terrestrial poultry could lead to interspecies transmission of H9N2 viruses from birds to pigs. Although H9N2 viruses do not appear to be continuously transmissible among pigs, repeated introductions of H9 viruses to pigs naturally increase the risk of generating mammalian-adapted or reassorted variants that are potentially infectious to humans. This study highlights the importance of monitoring the activity of H9N2 viruses in terrestrial poultry and pigs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据