4.8 Article

IXPE detection of polarized X-rays from magnetars and photon mode conversion at QED vacuum resonance

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216534120

关键词

neutron stars; X-rays; magnetic fields; radiation transport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent observations of 4U 0142+61 and 1RXS J170849.0-400910 by IXPE have provided a new way to study magnetars, which are neutron stars with extremely strong magnetic fields. The polarized X-rays from 4U 0142+61 show a 90° linear polarization swing, which can be explained by photon polarization mode conversion at the vacuum resonance in the magnetar atmosphere. This suggests that the atmosphere of 4U 0142 is composed of partially ionized heavy elements and that the surface magnetic field is comparable to or less than 1014 G.
The recent observations of the anomalous X-ray pulsars 4U 0142+61 and 1RXS J170849.0-400910 by the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) opened up a new avenue to study magnetars, neutron stars endowed with superstrong magnetic fields (B & GE; 1014 G). The detected polarized X-rays from 4U 0142+61 exhibit a 90 & DEG; linear polarization swing from low photon energies (E & LE; 4 keV) to high energies (E & GE; 5.5 keV). We show that this swing can be explained by photon polarization mode conversion at the vacuum resonance in the magnetar atmosphere; the resonance arises from the combined effects of plasma-induced birefringence and Quantum electrodynamics (QED)-induced vacuum birefringence in strong magnetic fields. This explanation suggests that the atmosphere of 4U 0142 is composed of partially ionized heavy elements and that the surface magnetic field is comparable to or less than 1014 G, consistent with the dipole field inferred from the measured spindown. It also implies that the spin axis of 4U 0142+61 is aligned with its velocity direction. The polarized X-rays from 1RXS J170849.0-400910 do not show such 90 & DEG; swing, consistent with magnetar atmospheric emission with B & GE; 5 x 1014 G.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据