4.5 Article

Design of compliant mechanisms based on compliant building elements. Part II: Practice

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.01.005

关键词

Flexure; Design methodology; Stiffness and compliance matrices; Compliant mechanism library; Multi -axis nanopositioner

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Part II, the Compliant Building Elements (CBE) method is introduced for generating practical designs of multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) compliant mechanisms. A library of compliant mechanisms is created based on the combination of prismatic beams, containing commonly used basic elements (BEs), serial elements (SEs), and parallel elements (PEs). Through examples, the design processes of a six-axis nanopositioner, a compliant steering mechanism, and a one-dimensional mechanical metamaterial structure are demonstrated using the library and CBE method. Each design yields a flexure topology that meets requirements and corresponding stiffness and compliance matrices for kinematic characteristics and stiffness optimization in selected axes.
In Part II, we present the use and application of the Compliant Building Elements (CBE) method to generate practical designs for different multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) compliant mechanisms. We first create a compliant mechanism library based on the combination of prismatic beams, which includes commonly used basic elements (BEs), serial elements (SEs), and parallel elements (PEs). Examples are given during the construction of the library. Based on the library and CBE method, we demonstrate the design of a six-axis nanopositioner, a compliant steering mechanism, and a one-dimensional mechanical metamaterial structure. The outcome of each design process yields a flexure topology that meets the design requirements as well as the corresponding parametric stiffness and compliance matrices, from which we can efficiently obtain the kinematic characteristics of the flexure system and optimize the stiffnesses in selected axes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据