4.7 Article

Effect of cone section combination form on the separation performance of a biconical hydrocyclone

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 419, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118325

关键词

Biconical hydrocyclone; Cone section combination form; Separation performance; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Multiphase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optimization of cone section structure is crucial for improving the separation performance of hydrocyclones, and the combination of multiple cone angles has more advantages than a single cone angle. In this study, CFD technology was used to simulate a biconical hydrocyclone with different cone section combinations. The influence of the combination form on internal multiphase flow motion was analyzed, and the effects of the structural parameters of double-cone hydrocyclone on separation efficiency were explored. The results showed that changing the cone section transition diameter could decrease the cut size, increase the total separation effectiveness, and improve the accuracy of separation.
Cone section structure optimization is critical in improving hydrocyclone separation performance, and the combination of multiple cone sections has more advantages than a single cone angle. Here, CFD technology is used to simulate a biconical hydrocyclone with different cone section combinations. The influence of the com-bination form on internal multiphase flow motion was analyzed, and the influences of the structural parameters of double-cone hydrocyclone on separation efficiency was explored. The results show that when the upper and lower cone angles of the biconical hydrocyclone are constant and the cone section transition diameter is changed, the cut size decreases, total separation effectiveness increases, and the accuracy of separation improves with increasing transition diameter. When the cone section transition diameter is constant and the upper cone angle is changed, total separation efficiency and accuracy decreases and cut size increases as the upper cone angle increases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据