4.4 Article

A simplified strategy for sensitive detection of Rose rosette virus compatible with three RT-PCR chemistries

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 47-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.01.013

关键词

Diagnostics; TaqMan RT-qPCR; SYBR-Green RT-qPCR; High Resolution Melting; HRM; Biosecurity

资金

  1. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station [OKL02773]
  2. American Floral Endowment
  3. USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Specialty Crop Research Initiative project, Combating Rose Rosette Disease: Short Term and Long Term Approaches [2014-51181-22644/SCRI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rose rosette disease is a disorder associated with infection by Rose rosette virus (RRV), a pathogen of roses that causes devastating effects on most garden cultivated varieties, and the wild invasive rose especially Rosa multiflora. Reliable and sensitive detection of this disease in early phases is needed to implement proper control measures. This study assesses a single primer-set based detection method for RRV and demonstrates its application in three different chemistries: Endpoint RT-PCR, TaqMan-quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) and SYBR Green RT-qPCR with High Resolution Melting analyses. A primer set (RRV2F/2R) was designed from consensus sequences of the nucleocapsid protein gene p3 located in the RNA 3 region of RRV. The specificity of primer set RRV2F/2R was validated in silica against published GenBank sequences and in-vitro against infected plant samples and an exclusivity panel of near-neighbor and other viruses that commonly infect Rosa spp. The developed assay is sensitive with a detection limit of 1 fg from infected plant tissue. Thirty rose samples from 8 different states of the United States were tested using the developed methods. The developed methods are sensitive and reliable, and can be used by diagnostic laboratories for routine testing and disease management decisions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据