4.6 Article

Patient visits and prescriptions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from 2017-2021: Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic in primary care

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281307

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine whether there was an increase in ADHD-related visits and frequency of care from family physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic medical records from the University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network were used to analyze family physician visits and prescriptions for ADHD medications. The results showed that the number of ADHD-related visits during the pandemic remained consistent with pre-pandemic trends, but the observed visits in 2021 were 1.32 times higher than expected, indicating increased frequency of visits to family physicians among ADHD patients.
ObjectiveTo determine whether more patients presented with Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related visits and/or sought care from family physicians more frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsElectronic medical records from the University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network were used to characterize changes in family physician visits and prescriptions for ADHD medications. Annual patient prevalence and visit rates pre-pandemic (2017-2019) were used to calculate the expected rates in 2020 and 2021. The expected and observed rates were compared to identify any pandemic-related changes. ResultsThe number of patients presenting for ADHD-related visits during the pandemic was consistent with pre-pandemic trends. However, observed ADHD-related visits in 2021 were 1.32 times higher than expected (95% CI: 1.05-1.75), suggesting that patients visited family physicians more frequently than before the pandemic. ConclusionDemand for primary care services related to ADHD has continued to increase during the pandemic, with increased health service use among those accessing care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据