4.6 Article

Objective perimetry identifies regional functional progression and recovery in mild Diabetic Macular Oedema

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287319

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared macular structure obtained from optical coherence tomography (OCT) with retinal function measured objectively with the ObjectiveFIELD Analyzer (OFA) and Matrix perimetry. The results showed that changes in retinal function measured by OFA may be a more effective method for monitoring diabetic macular edema (DME) over time compared to Matrix perimetry data.
PurposeRetinal function beyond foveal vision is not routinely examined in the clinical screening and management of diabetic retinopathy although growing evidence suggests it may precede structural changes. In this study we compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) based macular structure with function measured objectively with the ObjectiveFIELD Analyzer (OFA), and with Matrix perimetry. We did that longitudinally in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with mild Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO) with good vision and a similar number of T2D patients without DMO, to evaluate changes in retinal function more peripherally over the natural course of retinopathy. MethodsBoth eyes of 16 T2D patients (65.0 & PLUSMN; 10.1, 10 females), 10 with baseline DMO, were followed for up longitudinally for 27 months providing 94 data sets. Vasculopathy was assessed by fundus photography. Retinopathy was graded using to Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines. Posterior-pole OCT quantified a 64-region/eye thickness grid. Retinal function was measured with 10-2 Matrix perimetry, and the FDA-cleared OFA. Two multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) variants presented 44 stimuli/eye within either the central 30 & DEG; or 60 & DEG; of the visual field, providing sensitivities and delays for each test-region. OCT, Matrix and 30 & DEG; OFA data were mapped to a common 44 region/eye grid allowing change over time to be compared at the same retinal regions. ResultsIn eyes that presented with DMO at baseline, mean retinal thickness reduced from 237 & PLUSMN; 25 & mu;m to 234.2 & PLUSMN; 26.7 & mu;m, while the initially non-DMO eyes significantly increased their mean thickness from 250.7 & PLUSMN; 24.4 & mu;m to 255.7 & PLUSMN; 20.6 & mu;m (both p<0.05). Eyes that reduced in retinal thickness over time recovered to more normal OFA sensitivities and delays (all p<0.021). Matrix perimetry quantified fewer regions that changed significantly over the 27 months, mostly presenting in the central 8 degrees. ConclusionsChanges in retinal function measured by OFA possibly offer greater power to monitor DMO over time than Matrix perimetry data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据