4.6 Article

Distinctive features of lipoprotein profiles in stroke patients

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283855

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classes of lipoproteins play a vital role in preventing atherosclerotic diseases by solubilizing lipids in the blood. Comparing HPLC data of stroke patients and controls, without considering ultracentrifugation, revealed significant differences. HDL1 levels were low in many patients, indicating a higher intake of animal fats. The TG/cholesterol ratio of chylomicrons was also lower in patients, suggesting a potential risk factor.
Classes of lipoproteins solubilize lipids in the blood, and their profiles are important for preventing atherosclerotic diseases. These can be identified by gel filtration HPLC, which has been analyzed in a manner that yields the same values as the de facto standard method, i.e., ultracentrifugation; however, previous studies have found that ultracentrifugation and its simplified alternatives, enzymatic methods, yield incorrect values. Here HPLC data of stroke patients and the controls were compared using data-driven analyses, without consideration for ultracentrifugation. The data well-separated patients from controls. In many patients, the level of HDL1 (a cholesterol scavenger) was low. The TG/cholesterol ratio of chylomicrons was found to be low in patients and high in the healthy elderly; the lower level may indicate a larger intake of animal fats. High levels of free glycerol in the elderly were hazardous, suggesting more dependence on lipids as an energy source. Statins had minimal effect on these factors. LDL cholesterol, the commonly-used risk indicator, was not a risk factor actually. Enzymatic methods failed to separate the patients from the control; hence, the existing guidelines for screening methods and medical treatment need to be revised. As an immediate step, glycerol would be an adaptable indicator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据