4.7 Article

Specific alterations in riboproteomes composition of isonicotinic acid treated arabidopsis seedlings

期刊

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 4-5, 页码 379-392

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-022-01332-2

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; Translation regulation; Proteomics; Ribosomal protein small subunit (RPS); Ribosomal protein large subunit (RPL); Plant immunity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants have developed strategies to cope with various stresses, and ribosomes can adapt to different stress conditions. By analyzing immunopurified ribosomes from Arabidopsis leaves treated with an inducer of plant innate immunity, potential ribosome-associated proteins involved in innate immunity were identified.
Plants have developed strategies to deal with the great variety of challenges they are exposed to. Among them, common targets are the regulation of transcription and translation to finely modulate protein levels during both biotic and abiotic stresses. Increasing evidence suggests that ribosomes are highly adaptable modular supramolecular structures which remodel to adapt to stresses. Each Arabidopsis thaliana ribosome consists of approximately 81 distinct ribosomal proteins (RPs), each of which is encoded by two to seven genes. To investigate the identity of ribosomal proteins of the small subunit (RPS) and of the large subunit (RPL) as well as ribosomes-associated proteins, we analysed by LC/MS/MS immunopurified ribosomes from A. thaliana leaves treated with isonicotinic acid (INA), an inducer of plant innate immunity. We quantified a total of 2084 proteins. 165 ribosome-associated proteins showed increased abundance while 52 were less abundant. Of the 52 identified RPS (from a possibility of 104 encoding genes), 15 were deregulated. Similarly, from the 148 possible RPL, 80 were detected and 9 were deregulated. Our results revealed potential candidates involved in innate immunity that could be interesting targets for functional genomic studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据