4.7 Article

Protective effect of saffron carotenoids against amyloid beta-induced neurotoxicity in differentiated PC12 cells via the unfolded protein response and autophagy

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7773

关键词

AD; autophagy; A beta Os; crocetin; crocin; UPR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the carotenoids Cro and Crt in saffron can protect cells from apoptosis induced by β amyloid oligomers. Cro and Crt increase cell survival by inhibiting the JNK-Bcl-2-Beclin1 pathway and regulating the autophagy pathway. These findings contribute to the prevention of Alzheimer's disease.
The preventive effect of saffron against Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been reported. Herein, we studied the effect of Cro and Crt, saffron carotenoids, on the cellular model of AD. The MTT assay, flow cytometry, and elevated p-JNK, p-Bcl-2, and c-PARP indicated the A beta Os-induced apoptosis in differentiated PC12 cells. Then, the protective effects of Cro/Crt on dPC12 cells against A beta Os were investigated in preventive and therapeutic modalities. Starvation was used as a positive control. RT-PCR and Western blot results revealed the reduced eIF2 alpha phosphorylation and increased spliced-XBP1, Beclin1, LC3II, and p62, which indicate the A beta Os-induced autophagic flux defect, autophagosome accumulation, and apoptosis. Cro and Crt inhibited the JNK-Bcl-2-Beclin1 pathway. They altered Beclin1 and LC3II and decreased p62 expressions, leading cells to survival. Cro and Crt altered the autophagic flux by different mechanisms. So, Cro increased the rate of autophagosome degradation more than Crt, while Crt increased the rate of autophagosome formation more than Cro. The application of 4 mu 8C and chloroquine as the inhibitors of XBP1 and autophagy, respectively, confirmed these results. So, augmentation of the survival branches of UPR and autophagy is involved and may serve as an effective strategy to prevent the progression of A beta Os toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据