4.4 Article

Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus among 193,435 Cats Attending Primary-Care Veterinary Practices in England

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 964-972

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14365

关键词

Endocrine; Feline; Statistical modelling; Surveillance; VetCompass

资金

  1. Kennel Club Charitable Trust
  2. Kennel Club
  3. Dogs Trust
  4. Evetts Luff Animal Welfare Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a common endocrine disease of cats. The prevalence of DM in cats in England is not well-defined. Hypothesis/ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence and identify risk factors for DM in a large population of cats attending primary-care practices. AnimalsA cohort of 193,563 cats in the VetCompass Programme attending 118 primary-care practices in England. MethodsCross-sectional analysis of cohort clinical data. Data were extracted covering September 1st 2009 and August 31st 2014. Period prevalence of DM was calculated. Associations between risk factors and DM were assessed using logistic regression modelling. ResultsOf 1,128 DM cases were identified among 194,563 cats (period prevalence 0.58%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.61). Multivariable modelling indicated that Tonkinese (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.8-9.6; P = .001), Norwegian Forest (odds ratio [OR] 3.5; 95% CI 1.3-9.6; P = .001) and Burmese (OR 3.0; 95% CI 2.0-4.4; P < .001) cats had increased odds of DM compared with crossbred cats. DM odds increased as bodyweight categories increased above 4 kg (P < .001), as cats aged beyond 6 years old (P < .001) and in insured cats (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.6-2.4; P < .001) but sex was not significantly associated with DM. Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceDiabetes mellitus is an important component of the primary-care practice caseload with 1-in-200 cats affected. An increased risk of DM in certain cat breeds supports a genetic predisposition. These results can guide future research and preventative healthcare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据