4.4 Article

Simulation investigations on discharge process of a pseudospark switch in series with a magnetic switch

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0133538

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conduction loss of the pseudospark switch can be reduced by connecting the magnetic switch and pseudospark switch in series to form the magnetically delayed pseudospark switch. In this study, a 2D electrostatic Particle in Cell/Monte Carlo Collision simulation model of the magnetically delayed pseudospark switch coupled with the external circuit is established to investigate the discharge process and characteristics. It is found that the forward conduction process of the magnetically delayed pseudospark switch can be divided into four stages.
The conduction loss of the pseudospark switch (PSS) can be reduced by connecting the magnetic switch (MS) and PSS in series to form the magnetically delayed pseudospark switch (MDPSS). In this paper, a 2D electrostatic Particle in Cell/Monte Carlo Collision simulation model of MDPSS coupled with the external circuit is established, and the discharge process and characteristics are studied. It is found that the forward conduction process of the MDPSS can be divided into four stages. The first stage is characterized by the rapid drop of anode voltage, and the discharge mechanism is mainly the collision ionization of seed electrons. In the second stage, the anode voltage increases slowly, which is mainly maintained by secondary electrons emitted by ions impacting the cathode. The third stage marks the beginning of MS saturation, accompanied by the rapid rise of anode voltage and loop current, as well as the rapid strengthening of the sheath electric field in the cavity, thus inducing the fourth stage, that is, the complete conduction of PSS. The duration of hollow cathode discharge will be prolonged by increasing the number of magnetic cores, thus further reducing the total conduction loss of the switch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据