4.8 Review

Halloysite Clay Nanotubes for Loading and Sustained Release of Functional Compounds

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1227-1250

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201502341

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy under EPSCoR [DE-SC0012432]
  2. Louisiana Board of Regents
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Prize
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51320105012, 81330043]
  5. Beijing Nova Program [Z131102000413015]
  6. Russian Science Foundation [14-14-00924]
  7. Russian Science Foundation [14-14-00924] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Halloysite is an alumosilicate tubular clay with a diameter of 50 nm, an inner lumen of 15 nm and a length of 600-900 nm. It is a natural biocompatible nanomaterial available in thousands of tons at low price, which makes it a good candidate for nanoarchitectural composites. The inner lumen of halloysite may be adjusted by etching to 20-30% of the tube volume and loading with functional agents (antioxidants, anticorrosion agents, flame-retardant agents, drugs, or proteins) allowing for formulations with sustained release tuned by the tube end-stoppers for hours and days. Clogging the tube ends in polymeric composites allows further extension of the release time. Thus, antioxidant-loaded halloysite doped into rubber enhances anti-aging properties for at least 12 months. The addition of 3-5 wt% of halloysite increases the strength of polymeric materials, and the possibility of the tube's orientation promises a gradient of properties. Halloysite nanotubes are a promising mesoporous media for catalytic nanoparticles that may be seeded on the tube surface or synthesized exclusively in the lumens, providing enhanced catalytic properties, especially at high temperatures. In vitro and in vivo studies on biological cells and worms indicate the safety of halloysite, and tests for efficient adsorption of mycotoxins in animals' stomachs are also carried out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据