4.7 Article

Modeling and validation of coarse-grained computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method for dense gas-solid flow simulation in a bubbling fluidized bed

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0146264

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coarse-grained (CG) CFD-DEM method reduces the number of particles by replacing multiple smaller particles with larger ones called parcels, and fully considers particle collisions. The investigation shows that the CG CFD-DEM method significantly decreases computation time in simulating dense gas-solid flows, and the results agree well with experimental data and fine-grained CFD-DEM method.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) combined with the discrete element method (DEM) are powerful tools for analyzing dense gas-solid flows. However, the computational cost of CFD-DEM will be unfeasibly great when simulating large-scale engineering applications with billions of particles. Accordingly, the coarse-grained (CG) CFD-DEM method is applied to solve this problem. This investigated method replaces several smaller particles with larger ones called parcels, aiming to reduce the number of particles and fully consider the collision of particles between composition parcels and the collision of particles within composition parcels. First, high-speed photography verifies the numerical simulation's reliability. Then, the CG CFD-DEM was used to analyze the transient spatial distribution, transient average velocity, pressure drop, bed height, and the mixing state of particles in a dense gas-solid fluidized bed. The CG CFD-DEM was also compared with the CFD-DEM results, which showed a good agreement with the calculation results and proved the accuracy and applicability of the method. Finally, the computation time of the CG CFD-DEM was evaluated, showing a significant decrease in computation time with an increasing coarse ratio (k). This investigation can provide theoretical reference for the numerical simulation of the CG CFD-DEM method in dense gas-solid flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据