4.7 Article

Large eddy simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction under incipient and fully separated conditions

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0147829

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large eddy simulations are performed to study the impact of incipient and fully separated conditions on the flow field development in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction on a compression ramp at Ma = 5 and Re = 14,000. The simulation is validated by comparing with previous experimental and numerical results. Flow structures, turbulence properties, vortex structures, and low-frequency unsteadiness are investigated.
Large eddy simulations of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction on a compression ramp at the Mach number M a infinity = 5 and Reynolds number R e infinity = 14 000 are performed to investigate the impact of the incipient and fully separated conditions on the development of the flow field. The quasi-dynamic subgrid-scale kinetic energy equation model, which combines the benefits of the gradient model with the eddy-viscosity model, has been applied. Compared with the previous experimental and numerical results, the simulation was validated. The flow structures, turbulence properties, vortex structures, and low-frequency unsteadiness are all investigated. The flow field of the incipient separation is attached and rarely impacted by shock. An evident separation bubble and localized high wall temperatures in fully separated flow are caused by the separation shock's significant reverse pressure gradient. The Reynolds stress components exhibit significant amplification in both cases, and the peak outward shifts from the near-wall region to the center of the free shear layer. Turbulent kinetic energy terms were analyzed, and the two scenarios show a significant difference. The power spectral density of the wall pressure fluctuations shows that the low-frequency motion of the incipient separation is not apparent relative to the fully separated flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据