4.8 Article

Frequency-Stable Robust Wireless Power Transfer Based on High-Order Pseudo-Hermitian Physics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 130, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.077202

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant progress has been made in nonradiative wireless power transfer (WPT) technology with the utilization of the parity-time (PT) symmetry concept. In this study, we extend the standard second-order PT-symmetric Hamiltonian to a high-order symmetric tridiagonal pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian, allowing for the relaxation of limitations in multisource/multiload systems based on non-Hermitian physics. We propose a three-mode pseudo-Hermitian dual-transmitter-single-receiver circuit and demonstrate that robust efficiency and stable frequency WPT can be achieved without the presence of PT symmetry. Furthermore, no active tuning is required when the coupling coefficient between the intermediate transmitter and the receiver is changed. The application of pseudo-Hermitian theory to classical circuit systems provides new possibilities for expanding the application of coupled multicoil systems.
Nonradiative wireless power transfer (WPT) technology has made considerable progress with the application of the parity-time (PT) symmetry concept. In this Letter, we extend the standard second-order PT-symmetric Hamiltonian to a high-order symmetric tridiagonal pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian, relaxing the limitation of multisource/multiload systems based on non-Hermitian physics. We propose a three-mode pseudo-Hermitian dual-transmitter-single-receiver circuit and demonstrate that robust efficiency and stable frequency WPT can be attained despite the absence of PT symmetry. In addition, no active tuning is required when the coupling coefficient between the intermediate transmitter and the receiver is changed. The application of pseudo-Hermitian theory to classical circuit systems opens up an avenue for expanding the application of coupled multicoil systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据