4.8 Article

Squeezing and Overcoming the Heisenberg Scaling with Spin-Orbit Coupled Quantum Gases

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 130, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.090802

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We predict that exploiting spin-orbit coupling in a harmonically trapped spinor quantum gas can lead to scaling of the optimal measurement precision beyond the Heisenberg scaling. We show that quadratic scaling with the number of atoms can be facilitated via squeezed center-of-mass excitations of the atomic motion using 1D spin-orbit coupled fermions or strongly interacting bosons (Tonks-Girardeau gas). Based on predictions derived from analytic calculations of the corresponding quantum Fisher information, we then introduce a protocol which overcomes the Heisenberg scaling (and limit) with the help of a tailored excited and entangled many-body state of a noninteracting Bose-Einstein condensate. We identify corresponding optimal measurements and argue that even finite temperature as a source of decoherence is, in principle, rather favorable for the obtainable precision scaling.
We predict that exploiting spin-orbit coupling in a harmonically trapped spinor quantum gas can lead to scaling of the optimal measurement precision beyond the Heisenberg scaling. We show that quadratic scaling with the number of atoms can be facilitated via squeezed center-of-mass excitations of the atomic motion using 1D spin-orbit coupled fermions or strongly interacting bosons (Tonks-Girardeau gas). Based on predictions derived from analytic calculations of the corresponding quantum Fisher information, we then introduce a protocol which overcomes the Heisenberg scaling (and limit) with the help of a tailored excited and entangled many-body state of a noninteracting Bose-Einstein condensate. We identify corresponding optimal measurements and argue that even finite temperature as a source of decoherence is, in principle, rather favorable for the obtainable precision scaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据