4.5 Article

Effect of Sr doping on structural, magnetic and transport properties of La1-ySryMn0.5Co0•5O3±δ

期刊

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 657, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2023.414823

关键词

Perovskite; Aqueous solution combustion method; X-ray diffraction; Rietveld refinement; Magneto-resistance; Double exchange mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the structural, magnetic, and magneto transport properties of La1-ySryMn0.5Co0.5O3 +/-delta perovskites prepared by aqueous solution combustion synthesis were investigated. The effect of Sr doping on the properties of these perovskites was analyzed. X-ray diffraction was used to characterize the as-prepared perovskites for single phase formation. Magnetic study revealed an increase in ferromagnetic interactions at low temperatures in the doped compounds compared to the undoped compound. Resistivity measurements showed a reduction with Sr doping up to y = 0.5, attributed to enhanced ferromagnetic interactions and hopping probability of e(g) charge carriers due to high spin stabilized Co3+ ions.
Structural, magnetic and magneto transport properties of La1-ySryMn0.5Co0.5O3 +/-delta perovskites prepared by aqueous solution combustion synthesis were studied in detail. The effect of Sr doping on the properties of these perovskites was investigated. As-prepared perovskites were characterized using X-ray diffraction for single phase formation. Magnetic study was carried out for in depth analysis of the magnetic properties. AC susceptibility study shows a change in the behavior of undoped and doped compounds in low temperature region. Ferromagnetic interactions was found to increase in the low temperature region in the doped compounds compared to that in the undoped compound. The measurements on resistivity showed reduction with Sr doping up to y = 0.5. This is attributed to the high spin stabilized Co3+ ions which enhance the ferromagnetic interactions and the hopping probability of e(g) charge carriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据