4.6 Article

Exclusion statistics and thermodynamics of a straight k-mers lattice-gas: Analytical approximation and Monte Carlo simulations

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2023.128715

关键词

Equilibrium thermodynamics and statistical mechanics; Exclusion statistics; Lattice gases; Statistical mechanics of model systems; Multisite occupancy adsorption; Monte Carlo simulations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermodynamics of straight k-mers gas on the square lattice is studied by analyzing its relation to state exclusion statistics. The study introduces a new analytical approximation and performs a detailed Monte Carlo analysis. The spatial correlation between particle states is described using exclusion spectrum functions and is related to the thermodynamic potentials. An effective lattice analytical approximation is introduced and applied to dimers (k = 2) and trimers (k = 3). Simple closed analytical expressions for the coverage dependence of state exclusion probabilities and chemical potential are obtained. Remarkable agreement with fast relaxation Monte Carlo simulations is already found for the lowest degree of approximation.
Thermodynamics of straight k-mers gas on the square lattice is addressed from its relation to state exclusion statistics through a new analytical approximation along with a detailed MC analysis. Multiple state exclusion arising as consequence of the spatial correlation between particle states is described through exclusion spectrum functions and related to the thermodynamic potentials. An effective lattice analytical approximation is introduced through configurational mapping and applied to dimers (k = 2) and trimers (k = 3). Simple closed analytical forms for the coverage dependence of multiple state exclusion probabilities and chemical potential are obtained. Remarkable agreement with fast relaxation MC simulations carried out in this work is already found for the lowest degree of approximation. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据