4.5 Article

The associations between cognitive functions and TSNAX genetic variations in patients with schizophrenia

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173554

关键词

Cognitive functions; Genetic variations; Schizophrenia; Single nucleotide polymorphism; TSNAX

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to explore the genetic effect of the TSNAX gene on the cognitive functions of patients with schizophrenia. The results showed that TSNAX genetic polymorphisms influenced cognitive function in schizophrenia patients.
Background: The translin-associated factor X (TSNAX) gene, located adjacent to the DISC1 gene, has been implicated in schizophrenia. While cognitive impairment determines long-term the functional outcome of schizophrenia, the role of TSNAX in cognitive dysfunction of schizophrenia patients remains elusive. This study aimed to explore the genetic effect of TSNAX on cognitive functions of schizophrenia.Methods: We recruited 286 chronic schizophrenia patients who had been stabilized with antipsychotics for at least 2 months and genotyped three TSNAX SNPs (rs1630250, rs766288, rs6662926). Clinical symptoms and seven cognitive domains were assessed. The score of cognitive tests was standardized to T score.Results: Clinical symptoms were similar among genotypes of all the three SNPs. The GLM analysis demonstrated that TSNAX genetic polymorphisms influenced cognitive function of schizophrenia patients after adjustment for gender, age, and education. The patients with the rs1630250 C/G genotype performed better than the G/G homozygotes in the Trail Making A (p = 0.034). Those with the rs766288 G/T genotype also performed better than the G/G homozygotes in the Trail Making A (p = 0.012). The patients with the G/G genotype of rs6662926 also performed better than the C/C homozygotes in verbal learning and memory test (p = 0.044). Conclusions: This study suggests that the TSNAX gene variation may influence the cognitive functions of the patients with schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据