4.4 Article

Characterization of co-amorphous carvedilol-maleic acid system prepared by solvent evaporation

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2023.2194406

关键词

Carvedilol; maleic acid; co-amorphous; molecular interaction; solubility; physical stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to enhance the solubility and stability of the water-insoluble drug carvedilol (CAR) with maleic acid (MLE) to create a co-amorphous system. The optimal molar ratio of CAR to MLE was found to be 2:1. The co-amorphous system showed improved solubility of CAR and maintained stability in an amorphous form.
The aim of this study was to enhance the solubility and stability of the water-insoluble drug carvedilol (CAR) with maleic acid (MLE) to create a co-amorphous system by a solvent evaporation method. Phase diagrams of co-amorphous CAR-MLE, constructed from peak height in the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and the glass transition temperature (Tg) from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements, revealed that the optimal molar ratio of CAR to MLE was 2:1. The FTIR spectra indicated that the secondary amine-derived peak of CAR and the carboxy group-derived peak of MLE disappeared in the CAR:MLE (2:1) co-amorphous system. DSC measurements showed that the endothermic peaks associated with the melting of CAR and MLE disappeared and a Tg at 43 degrees C was apparent. Furthermore, the solubility of CAR tested using the shaking flask method for 24 h at 37 degrees C was 1.2 mu g/mL, whereas that of the co-amorphous system was approximately three times higher, at 3.5 mu g/mL. Finally, the stability was evaluated by powder- X-ray diffraction at 40 degrees C; no clear diffraction peaks originating from crystals were observed in the amorphous state until after approximately three months of storage. These results indicate that co-amorphization of CAR with MLE improved the solubility of CAR while maintaining its stability in an amorphous form.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据