4.5 Article

Surgical Outcomes of Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation and Intracochlear Schwannoma Removal

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.300

关键词

acoustic neuroma; cochlear implantation; intracochlear schwannoma; intralabyrinthine schwannoma; vestibular schwannoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear schwannoma removal can successfully remove the tumor and achieve good hearing performance.
ObjectiveIntracochlear schwannoma is very rare, and complete loss of hearing is inevitable after the removal of this tumor. Here, we discuss cochlear implantation (CI) performed simultaneously with the removal of an intracochlear schwannoma. Study DesignRetrospective single-center study. SettingTertiary medical institute. MethodsSimultaneous CI and intracochlear schwannoma removal were performed in 4 subjects. After subtotal cochleostomy, the tumors were removed meticulously, with preservation of the modiolus. A new slim modiolar electrode (Nucleus CI632) was placed in a manner that hugged the modiolus. The surgical outcomes of functional gain, word recognition score (WRS), sound localization, and hearing in noise and speech intelligibility tests were investigated. ResultsIntracochlear schwannomas were removed successfully from the 4 patients, with no remnant tumor. The mean aided hearing threshold 6 months after surgery was 25.0 +/- 1.8 dB, and the mean-aided WRS with a 60 dB stimulus was 36.0 +/- 18.8% (range 16%-60%). The Categorical Auditory Performance (CAP) score of the 3 single-sided deafness patients under contralateral ear masking was 7. The CAP score of the patient with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was 6, which improved from a preoperative score of 0. ConclusionWhen an intracochlear schwannoma does not completely invade the modiolus, CI with simultaneous tumor removal can be performed successfully, resulting in good hearing performance. A slim modiolar electrode can be placed stably at the modiolus after schwannoma removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据