4.3 Article

Nereididae (Annelida) phylogeny based on molecular data

期刊

ORGANISMS DIVERSITY & EVOLUTION
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 529-541

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13127-023-00608-9

关键词

Errantia; Gene order; Gymnonereidinae; Molecular systematics; Namanereidinae; Nereidinae; Phyllodocida; Pleistoannelida; Polychaeta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nereididae is a diverse and well-studied family within Annelida, and recent molecular approaches have shed light on its phylogenetic relationships. Our study used nuclear and mitochondrial markers to evaluate these relationships and confirmed the classification and relationships of subfamilies within Nereididae. We propose revisions to the subfamily definitions and diagnoses to better align with our current understanding of the group's phylogeny.
Nereididae is one of Annelida's most diverse and well-studied families; despite this, only recently have molecular approaches been used to access phylogenetic hypotheses within the family. At least two nereidid groups can be identified based on mitochondrial gene order; however, this type of molecular information is not available for most taxa, and relationships of subfamilies are still poorly understood. In the present study, we used nuclear and mitochondrial markers to evaluate relationships within Nereididae and verified hypotheses on subfamilies delineation and relationship. Our results suggest the paraphyletic status of Gymnonereidinae and Nereidinae, as well as some genera within these subfamilies. Despite this, a revision of these subfamilies delineation and diagnoses was presented to match current phylogenetic understanding of the group. We suggest reverting to the original definition of Gymnonereidinae to include only the genera originally proposed by Banse in 1977. Our results also support monophyly of a large group that can be defined by mitochondrial gene order. This group includes most taxa identified as Nereidinae, and therefore, we suggest that this feature should be used as diagnostic of the subfamily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据