4.6 Article

Affinely adjustable robust optimization for radiation therapy under evolving data uncertainty via semi-definite programming

期刊

OPTIMIZATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2023.2178848

关键词

Affinely adjustable robust optimization; semi-definite programming; radiation therapy optimization; evolving uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an improved robust optimization model is proposed for addressing data uncertainty in hypoxia-based radiation treatment planning. The model demonstrates effective handling of uncertainties in the dose influence matrix and re-oxygenation data in numerical experiments.
Static robust optimization has played an important role in radiotherapy, where the decisions aim to safeguard against all possible realizations of uncertainty. However, it may lead to overly conservative decisions or too expensive treatment plans, such as delivering significantly more dose than necessary. Motivated by the success of adjustable robust optimization in reducing highly conservative decision-making of static robust optimization in applications, in this paper, we present an affinely adjustable robust optimization (AARO) model for hypoxia-based radiation treatment planning in the face of evolving data uncertainty. We establish an exact semi-definite program reformulation of the model under a so-called affine decision rule and evaluate our model and approach on a liver cancer case as a proof-of-concept. Our AARO model incorporates uncertainties both in dose influence matrix and re-oxygenation data as well as inexactness of the revealed (re-oxygenation) data. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the adjustable model successfully handles uncertainty in both re-oxygenation and the dose matrix. They also show that, by utilizing information halfway through the treatment plan, the adjustable solutions of the AARO model outperform a static method while maintaining a similar total dose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据