4.5 Article

?-irradiation induced effects on structural, morphological and photoluminescence properties of PEO-PVA blended polymer films

期刊

OPTIK
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170563

关键词

Gamma Rays; XRD; ATR-FTIR

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PEO/PVA blends were studied for the effect of gamma radiation on their structural, morphological and photoluminescence properties. XRD, ATR-FTIR, optical microscopy and PL were used to examine the non-irradiated and irradiated samples with a radiation dose of 10 kGy. Gamma photons induced important chemical rearrangements, especially in PVA hydroxyl groups. The crystallinity rate was found to be strongly influenced by radiation. The blend samples exhibited core-shell nanoparticle behavior due to the luminescence properties, with PVA acting as the shell.
PEO/PVA blends have been prepared to investigate the effect of gamma rays on the structural, morphological and photoluminescence properties. The studies of non-irradiated and irradiated samples with radiation doses of 10 kGy were examined by using XRD, ATR-FTIR, Optical mi-croscopy and PL. Gamma photons induced important chemical rearrangements, especially by PVA hydroxyl groups. We found that the crystallinity rate is strongly influenced by radiation. In this context, one could predict that the immiscibility of PVA with PEO and the interactions between the chains are of the electrostatic type. A structural-scale disturbance due to the radical formation leads to spherulitic texture modifications of the PEO. Due to the luminescence properties, the blend samples behave like core-shell nanoparticles. This phenomenon is due to the fact that the PVA polymer played the role of shell. Irradiation makes it possible to obtain well-ordered spherulites and to get a high pore density. The irradiated blend showed a higher quantum yield. The significant chemical and morphological changes caused by gamma radiation favored the optical recombination of hydroxyl groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据