4.6 Editorial Material

Ferroelectric photovoltaic response engineered by lattice strain derived from local metal-ion dipoles

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 1582-1585

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OL.485829

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work proposes a strategy of lattice strain engineering by introducing a (Mg2/3Nb1/3)(3+) ion group into the B site of BiFeO3 films to construct local metal-ion dipoles, breaking through the unfavorable inverse relationship between polarization, bandgap, and leakage. By engineering the lattice strain, a giant remanent polarization of 98 mu C/cm(2), narrower bandgap of 2.56 eV, and significantly decreased leakage current are obtained, resulting in excellent photovoltaic response with high open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current. This study provides an alternative strategy to enhance ferroelectric photovoltaic performances by lattice strain derived from local metal-ion dipoles.
An unfavorable inverse relationship between polarization, bandgap, and leakage always limits the ferroelectric photovoltaic performances. This work proposes a strategy of lattice strain engineering different from traditional lattice distortion by introducing a (Mg2/3Nb1/3)(3+) ion group into the B site of BiFeO3 films to construct local metal-ion dipoles. A giant remanent polarization of 98 mu C/cm(2), narrower bandgap of 2.56 eV, and the decreased leakage current by nearly two orders of magnitude are synchronously obtained in the BiFe0.94(Mg2/3Nb1/3)(0.06)O-3 film by engineering the lattice strain, breaking through the inverse relationship among these three. Thereby, the open-circuit voltage and the short-circuit current of the photovoltaic effect reach as high as 1.05 V and 2.17 mu A /cm(2), respectively, showing an excellent photovoltaic response. This work provides an alternative strategy to enhance ferroelectric photovoltaic performances by lattice strain derived from local metal-ion dipoles. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据