4.6 Article

Generation of robust optical entanglement in cavity optomagnonics

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 7994-8004

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.478963

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a scheme for realizing robust optical entanglement in cavity optomagnonics, where two optical whispering gallery modes couple to a magnon mode in a YIG sphere. The simultaneous realization of beam-splitter-like and two-mode squeezing magnon-photon interactions can be achieved when the optical modes are driven by external fields. The entanglement between the optical modes is generated through their coupling with magnons, and the effects of initial thermal occupations of magnons can be eliminated through destructive quantum interference between the bright modes of the interface. Additionally, the excitation of the Bogoliubov dark mode protects the optical entanglement from thermal heating effects.
We propose a scheme to realize robust optical entanglement in cavity optomagnonics, where two optical whispering gallery modes (WGMs) couple to a magnon mode in a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) sphere. The beam-splitter-like and two-mode squeezing magnon-photon interactions can be realized simultaneously when the two optical WGMs are driven by external fields. Entanglement between the two optical modes is then generated via their coupling with magnons. By exploiting the destructive quantum interference between the bright modes of the interface, the effects of initial thermal occupations of magnons can be eliminated. Moreover, the excitation of the Bogoliubov dark mode is capable of protecting the optical entanglement from thermal heating effects. Therefore, the generated optical entanglement is robust against thermal noise and the requirement of cooling the magnon mode is relaxed. Our scheme may find applications in the study of magnon-based quantum information processing. & COPY; 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据