4.6 Article

Tuning spin-orbit coupling and realizing inverse persistent spin helix by an extra above-barrier radiation in a GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As heterostructure

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 14473-14481

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.488528

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigate the optical tuning of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling (SOC) through monitoring the spin-galvanic effect (SGE) in a GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As two dimensional electron gas. The experimental results reveal different tunabilities of Rashba and Dresselhaus-related SGE currents, and the ratio of their coefficients decreases with the power of the control light, indicating the formation of the inverse persistent spin helix state. Phenomenological and microscopic analysis shows that the Rashba SOC exhibits greater optical tunability compared to the Dresselhaus SOC.
A persistent spin helix with equal strength of the Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is expected for future spintronic devices due to the suppression of spin relaxation. In this work we investigate the optical tuning of the Rashba and Dresselhaus SOC by monitoring the spin-galvanic effect (SGE) in a GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As two dimensional electron gas. An extra control light above the bandgap of the barrier is introduced to tune the SGE excited by a circularly polarized light below the bandgap of GaAs. We observe different tunability of the Rashba-and Dresselhaus-related SGE currents and extract the ratio of the Rashba and Dresselhaus coefficients. It decreases monotonously with the power of the control light and reaches a particular value of similar to-1, implying the formation of the inverse persistent spin helix state. By analyzing the optical tuning process phenomenologically and microscopically, we reveal greater optical tunability of the Rashba SOC than that of the Dresselhaus SOC. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据