4.7 Article

A new method for high dynamic range 3D measurement combining adaptive fringe projection and original-inverse fringe projection

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107490

关键词

Three dimensional; Highly reflective surfaces; Original and inverse adaptive fringe projection

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new scheme combining the original and inverse adaptive fringe projection method (OIAFPM) with AFPM, called OIAFPM. Experiments confirm that the 3D measurement employing OIAFPM is much better than that employing AFPM and OIFPM, and the measurement efficiency employing OIAFPM is also higher than that employing MEM.
For fringe projection profilometry (FPP), high reflections on metal, plastic, and ceramic surfaces cause inten-sity saturation, resulting in three dimensional (3D) measurement errors. The measurement efficiency using the multiple exposure method (MEM) is low and the exposure time is difficult to quantify. The original and inverse fringe projection method (OIFPM) suffers from saturation of the opposite fringes on highly reflective surfaces. The adaptive fringe projection method (AFPM) is still limited by image dynamic range and pixel mapping accu-racy. To this end, this paper proposes a new scheme combining OIFPM and AFPM, called the original and inverse adaptive fringe projection method (OIAFPM). Firstly, an adaptive intensity template in the camera coordinate system is generated. Secondly, a pixel mapping between the camera and projector images is established. Thirdly, original and inverse adaptive fringes are generated and projected. Finally, 72 wrapped phase calculation equa-tions are given in detail. Experiments confirm that the 3D measurement employing the proposed OIAFPM is much better than that employing AFPM and OIFPM. Although the 3D measurement employing MEM is similar to that employing OIAFPM, the measurement efficiency employing OIAFPM is much higher than that employing MEM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据