4.5 Article

Two-ways chip to chip communications through 2-dimensional photonic structures via photonic integrated circuit

期刊

OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-023-04941-3

关键词

Photonic crystal structures; Photonic band gap; Photonic integrated circuit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two-dimensional photonic structures were used to achieve chip-to-chip communications. The transportation of signals from one chip to another was found to be possible due to the change in lower potential value. The investigation focused on the photonic band gap analysis of the proposed crystal and the efficiencies of different structures were explored by examining various types of losses.
In this study, two-dimensional photonic structures (triangular, square, and honeycomb) are used to realise chip-to-chip communications in two ways. The transportation of signals from one chip to another is quite plausible because the lower potential value changes from 0.55 to 1.0 V. In this case, the operational mechanisms cope with the investigation of the photonic band gap analysis of the proposed crystal, which is prepared using the plane wave expansion technique. Apart from this, various types of losses such as propagation, diffraction, absorption, and scattering have also been investigated to realise the different efficiencies of the structures. These communications are envisaged through a laser diode (transmitter), photonic crystal structure (waveguide), and photo diode (receiver), which in turn act as a photonic integrated circuit. Here, 0.55 V, 0.62 V, 0.65 V, 0.68 V, 0.72 V, 0.75 V, 0.78 V, 0.8 V, 0.83 V, 0.86 V, 0.88 V, 0.90 V, 0.91 V, 0.92 V, 0.94 V, 0.95 V, 0.97 V, 0.98 V, and 1.0 V have been employed to realise an efficient optical VLSI device. The output result indicates that no loss is accomplished with the photonic integrated circuit, which infers efficient circuits for the exchange of signals from one electronic chip to another.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据