4.6 Article

Scalable self attraction and loading calculations for unstructured ocean tide models

期刊

OCEAN MODELLING
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102160

关键词

Self attraction and loading; Tidal modeling; Unstructured ocean model; High performance computing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self attraction and earth-loading effects are important for accurately modeling global tides. We investigate two different approaches to perform these calculations for ocean models that employ unstructured meshes and distributed memory parallelization. Our results show that the scalability of the unstructured mesh approach allows for more efficient spherical harmonics transforms for high-resolution meshes and large processor counts, enabling the efficient inclusion of tidal dynamics in large-scale Earth system model simulations.
Self attraction and earth-loading effects are important for accurately modeling global tides. A common approach of handling this forcing is to expand mass anomalies into spherical harmonics, which are scaled by load Love numbers to account for elastic earth deformation. We investigate two different approaches to perform these calculations for ocean models that employ unstructured meshes and distributed memory parallelization. The first approach leverages a highly efficient spherical harmonics library, but requires all-to -one and one-to-all communications and interpolation operations between the unstructured and a structured mesh. This approach is compared to a parallel algorithm that computes the spherical harmonic transformations directly on the unstructured mesh with an all-reduce communication. Our results show that although the unstructured mesh calculations are more expensive, the scalability of the unstructured mesh approach allows for more efficient spherical harmonics transforms for high-resolution meshes and large processor counts. This methodology enables the efficient inclusion of tidal dynamics large-scale Earth system model simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据