4.7 Article

On the size effects of toroidal tuned liquid column dampers for mitigating wind- and wave-induced vibrations of monopile wind turbines

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113988

关键词

Tuned liquid column damper; Size effects; Vibration control; Shaking table test; Real-time hybrid simulation; Wind turbine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study experimentally investigates the impact of size effects of the toroidal tuned liquid column damper (TTLCD) on control efficiency using the real-time hybrid simulation technique. The results show that the effects of experimental scale on control efficiency and liquid response are insignificant, and a larger length ratio leads to stronger performance. The TTLCD is found to be an efficient additional damping device in monopile wind turbines.
The toroidal tuned liquid column damper (TTLCD) can be applied in flexible structures to improve the structural dynamic responses. This study focuses on the impact of size effects of TTLCD on the control efficiency. Two types of size effects are experimentally addressed using the real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) technique: (1) the effects of experimental scale, and (2) the effects of length ratio. A large number of RTHSs are performed, in which a monopile wind turbine is numerically simulated as the numerical substructure, and five TTLCDs with various experimental scales or length ratios are experimentally tested as the physical substructure. The RTHS results show that the effects of experimental scale on the control efficiency and liquid response are insignificant, and a larger length ratio leads to a stronger performance. Besides, the TTLCD is found to be an efficient additional damping device in monopile wind turbines. The comparison between the RTHS results and the simulation results from a theoretical model is made, and it demonstrates that the theoretical model can capture the dynamic interaction process between the structure and TTLCD with good accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据