4.7 Article

Thrust scaling for a large-amplitude heaving and pitching foil with application to cycloidal propulsion

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114169

关键词

Pitching and heaving foil; Thrust; Chimera method; Cycloidal propulsion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Chimera method, in combination with the OpenFOAM toolbox, is used to numerically compute the forces generated by large amplitude heaving and pitching foil. The study explores the possibility of fitting thrust prediction laws, based on classical potential flow theories, with the numerically computed forces at a Reynolds number of 5×104. The results show that theoretical scaling can be applied to numerical time-averaged thrust data even in the case of large amplitude motions, and the thrust-prediction law is still applicable to pitching-rotating motions.
A numerical solution procedure using the mesh-superposition approach, known as the Chimera method, together with the OpenFOAM toolbox environment is used to compute the forces generated by large amplitude heaving and pitching foil. The possibility of fitting thrust prediction laws, based on classical potential flow theories, with the numerically computed forces is explored, for a Reynolds number of 5 104. It is shown, first for a pure heaving motion and subsequently by adding a harmonic pitching motion, that theoretical scaling may be fitted to numerical time-averaged thrust data, even in the case of large amplitude motions. The thrust-prediction law is shown to still apply to pitching-rotating motions, such as those of blades in cycloidal propulsion devices, the mean pressure correction due to the additional surging motion being small. The synchronized rotation-pitching of three foils typical of a cross-flow propeller configuration is addressed as well. The numerical global thrust results are shown to be in general agreement with the theoretical prediction, but also with blade-embedded load cell measurements for an experimental device developed by the French Naval Academy Research Institute.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据