4.7 Article

Effects of thermoneutrality on food intake, body weight, and body composition in a Prader-Willi syndrome mouse model

期刊

OBESITY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1644-1654

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23766

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored whether housing PWS mouse models in a thermoneutral environment could induce hyperphagia and obesity. The results showed that Snord116del mice housed in a thermoneutral environment had lower body weight, fat content, and food intake compared to wild-type mice housed at room temperature. However, the thermoneutral environment did not significantly affect the obesity level and food intake of Snord116del mice.
ObjectivePrader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a multisystem genetic disorder. Unfortunately, none of several mouse models carrying PWS mutations emulates the entirety of the human PWS phenotype, including hyperphagia plus obesity. MethodsTo determine whether housing at thermoneutrality (TN, 30 degrees C) permits the development of hyperphagia and obesity in the Snord116del PWS mouse model, the effects of housing three different ages of Snord116del and wild-type (WT) littermates at TN versus room temperature (RT, 22-24 degrees C) for 8 weeks were compared. ResultsSnord116del mice born and maintained at TN exhibited lower body weight curves, lower percentage fat mass, and lower food intake than WT mice at RT. In 4- to 6-month-old high-fat diet-fed female mice, TN raised the Snord116del body weight curve closer to that of RT-housed WT mice although the TN-housed Snord116del mice did not gain more adiposity or exhibit greater food intake. In 6- to 8-month-old high-fat diet-fed male mice, body weight, adiposity, and food intake of TN-housed Snord116del mice remained far below levels in RT-housed WT mice. TN elicited hypotonia in Snord116del adults and exacerbated mortality of Snord116del newborns. ConclusionsIn none of three tested TN protocols were greater food intake, body weight, or adiposity induced in Snord116del mice compared with RT-housed WT mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据