4.8 Article

Human and bacterial TatD enzymes exhibit apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease activity

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 2838-2849

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad133

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the nuclease activities of human TatD paralogs TATDN1 and TATDN3, which include both 3'-5' exonuclease activity and AP endonuclease activity. The two nuclease activities are exhibited in different types of DNA and are regulated by divalent metal cofactors. The study also shows that the three E. coli TatD paralogs also possess AP endonuclease activity.
TatD enzymes are evolutionarily conserved deoxyribonucleases associated with DNA repair, apoptosis, development, and parasite virulence. Three TatD paralogs exist in humans, but their nuclease functions are unknown. Here, we describe the nuclease activities of two of the three human TatD paralogs, TATDN1 and TATDN3, which represent two phylogenetically distinct clades based on unique active site motifs. We found that in addition to 3 '-5 ' exonuclease activity associated with other TatD proteins, both TATDN1 and TATDN3 exhibited apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease activity. The AP endonuclease activity was observed only in double-stranded DNA, whereas exonuclease activity was operative primarily in single-stranded DNA. Both nuclease activities were observed in the presence of Mg2+ or Mn2+, and we identified several divalent metal cofactors that inhibited exonuclease and supported AP endonuclease activity. Biochemical analysis and a crystal structure of TATDN1 bound to 2 '-deoxyadenosine 5 '-monophosphate in the active site are consistent with two-metal ion catalysis, and we identify several residues that differentiate nuclease activities in the two proteins. In addition, we show that the three Escherichia coli TatD paralogs are also AP endonucleases, indicating that this activity is conserved across evolution. Together, these results indicate that TatD enzymes constitute a family of ancient AP endonucleases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据