4.8 Article

The MksG nuclease is the executing part of the bacterial plasmid defense system MksBEFG

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 3288-3306

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad130

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells face the constant risk of foreign DNA invasion, and bacteria have developed strategies similar to an innate immune system to defend against it. This study investigates the MksBEFG complex in Corynebacterium glutamicum, which degrades plasmid DNA. The structure of MksG reveals that it acts as a nuclease and has a binding site essential for DNA cleavage. The Mks system is regulated through the polar scaffold protein DivIVA and is activated when plasmids are introduced.
Cells are continuously facing the risk of taking up foreign DNA that can compromise genomic integrity. Therefore, bacteria are in a constant arms race with mobile genetic elements such as phages, transposons and plasmids. They have developed several active strategies against invading DNA molecules that can be seen as a bacterial 'innate immune system'. Here, we investigated the molecular arrangement of the Corynebacterium glutamicum MksBEFG complex, which is homologous to the MukBEF condensin system. We show here that MksG is a nuclease that degrades plasmid DNA. The crystal structure of MksG revealed a dimeric assembly through its C-terminal domain that is homologous to the TOPRIM domain of the topoisomerase II family of enzymes and contains the corresponding ion binding site essential for DNA cleavage in topoisomerases. The MksBEF subunits exhibit an ATPase cycle in vitro and we reason that this reaction cycle, in combination with the nuclease activity provided by MksG, allows for processive degradation of invading plasmids. Super-resolution localization microscopy revealed that the Mks system is spatially regulated via the polar scaffold protein DivIVA. Introduction of plasmids results in an increase in DNA bound MksG, indicating an activation of the system in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据